A visit from God or Can God be Seen?

Image
  Short answer - YES. Not as Jesus, but as God the almighty.  To start, without listing all the scriptures that say God can be seen, instead I will explain why this is important and what they teach is off by a mile. Also to avoid the pronoun retards, I'll be using the pronoun "HE" Some of the most pronounced scriptures that leave no doubt that someone saw God can be found in the book of Exodus, example Exodus 33:20. Note here that God says the word "face". No where in scripture that it states that God is "invisible" or he is here in some resonance mystical voice (I'll get the burning bush later. Hint: there is a burning bush in time) , at least not unless they are speaking of an angel - which is another topic. Exodus 33:23 states that he will turn around and then he can be seen. Break this down, and you have some type of humanoid - I say this because the viewer is actually witnessing "someone" turning their back to them. So what is going

Cannibalism for Eternity


First we need to define cannibalism. In short, cannibalism is the eating of the same species. In this article we will be speaking of Humans eating Humans.

Ritual cannibalism, which I will be dealilng with here since it pertains to religion, is itself divided into exocannibalism (the eating of strangers and enemies), endocannibalism (the eating of friends or family) and autocannibalism (the eating of one’s own body). Endocannibalism is thought to have been performed in the hope of achieving communion with the dead. With exocannibalism and endocannibalism, there was the belief that by eating the dead person, some of his or her desirable qualities might be conferred upon the eater.

So now we have a clear definition of what eating of human flesh and blood is. There has been some (minor) debate regarding this practice in catholism. One article, although very well written, pretty much "red-herrings" the whole topic. I call it the Missing Dollar Riddle. Where there is no missing dollar, it is just how it is worded that makes one believe it is actually missing by using logical choice of words in the wrong context.

For the purposes of this post, I'll not be getting into the "miracles" of christ, as you can find them. Let it
suffice that I'll concede to those miracles and explain why it only proves further that cannibalism exists in the church. Since we know that Jesus (and definitely god) can change one substance into another - example the famous water-to-wine "miracle", It would stand to reason that when someone accept communion, the bread and the wine are actually turned into "flesh" and "blood". And in this instance when standing and accepting, it is "blessed" (casting a spell) that by the time you complete the ritual, you now have in you, the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ. 

Matt 26:26. He even says it is "his body". There is no red-herring.  

Matt 26:27-28 ...and his blood.

HOW it gets there(chips, bread, wine etc..) is a moot topic. It is only the medium to which it is transferred to each person. Once consumed, it transforms into a part of Jesus. Ergo, you just cannibalized a part of him. John 6:54 - Obviously you will not have eternal life from a potato chip and some alcohol. As mentioned in the linked article - just because you didnt "cook" the human, eating of him to gain eternal life, is the same. Why do you think it is called a "host".

Sadly, if you ask any catholic, they will tell you it is "metaphorically speaking". Many will toss around the big word "transubstantiated" basically means change one matter into another.   However, there again, you eat a chip, and drink some wine, then with the ritual of the communion POOF it is now a "host" or body of christ - doesn't "it" transsubstantiate into the flesh and blood of christ?

I thought so too.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Serpent of the Garden

A visit from God or Can God be Seen?